PHP Class Trismegiste\Mondrian\Analysis\CodeMetrics
Metrics are usefull to fast evaluate what kind of project you have
to refactor. But it is not a guide where you have to go. Of course
a project with a 50/50 ratio in interfaces/classes can be a good thing
but if classes are used in parameters of methods instead of interfaces,
interfaces are not really usefull. It's easy to fake good metrics.
This analyser also counts where methods are declared first in the
inheritance tree. A good point can be that you have low count of
method first declared in class. This can mean you can decouple your
concrete classes (remember LSP)
From my experience, it's better to have dirty code in loosely coupled
classes than beautiful code in highly coupled classes, because your beautiful
code does not stand a chance against the entropy of changing.
Dirty code can be refactored, even in paralell process, if you have loosely
coupling.
In short : Bad coding practices has bad metrics
but good metrics does not means good coding practices.
That's why I didn't push too far these statistics.
See the others tool to find out where the coupling is.
Mostra file
Open project: trismegiste/mondrian
Class Usage Examples
Public Methods
Private Methods
| Method |
Description |
|
|
extractShortName ( Vertex $v ) : string |
Extract the class name of a vertex to get a printable result |
|
Method Details
getCardinal()
public method
Makes the statistics on the code